Tags
Alan Rickman, Geraldine McEwan, Medieval England, Medieval Europe, Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves, Witchcraft
I commented in an earlier post about Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves (1991, dir. Kevin Reynolds) that one of the biggest anachronisms in the film is Mortianna the witch and what appears to be a Satanist coven. The problems with it are big enough that I decided to give it its own post.
Medieval Notions of Witchcraft
One of the persistent notions about the Middle Ages is that people were constantly terrified about witches and that witch hunting was a common phenomenon in the period. The reality is quite different. The average medieval person probably did have a vague belief in witches and some fear that he or she could be a victim of witchcraft, probably the way that many modern Americans have a belief in serial killers and some vague fear that they could become a victim of one. But the surviving evidence from the medieval period suggests that this wasn’t a serious fear that obsessed people, the way films and tv shows typically present it.
Many communities probably had a small number of men and women that I will call ‘cunning folk’. The term is not really medieval (it’s mostly used in the period form the 15th to the 20th centuries), but it’s one of the terms modern scholars of witchcraft have adopted. Cunning folk were men and women who had unusual knowledge of semi-magical matters, such as the medicinal uses of plants, contraceptive and abortifacient techniques, the making of poisons and love charms, faith healing practices, how to find lost objects or predict the future, how to manipulate the weather, how to curse people and protect against curses, and so on. Different cunning folk appear to have specialized in one or two of these matters, and accepted payment in exchange for their assistance. These folk magical practices were used to help people deal with problems that were out of their direct control (such as medical problems and the weather). Such practices were not, by and large, illegal in the medieval period.

McEwan as Mortianna
What was illegal, however, was using such practices to inflict harm on another person, for example by causing crops to fail or making someone fall down a flight of stairs. Employed this way, folk magic could be charged in court as maleficia, the causing of harm by magical means. The issue here is not that using magic is inherently evil, it’s that harming a person is evil. Magic is simply understood as the tool through which evil was done. (If I kill you with my car, I may have commited vehicular homicide, but driving a car isn’t evil in itself.) So periodically, down into the 15th century, we find secular courts charging people with maleficia. But in the surviving records, it’s not a common charge; I know of only a tiny handful of such cases across the entirety of medieval English history.
Nor was the medieval Church particularly worried about witches. As I noted in one of my posts on Salem, for much of the medieval period, the prevailing view among theologians is that witchcraft wasn’t really possible. If people thought they had performed magic, they were actually deluded. In particular the idea that old women could perform malevolent magic was discounted. That doesn’t mean that medieval clergy had no belief in magic at all; they often had a strong belief in astrology, in alchemy, in the hidden (‘occult’) properties of plants and minerals, and in the communication with spirits, who might have knowledge beyond what humans had. These forms of magic were seen as educated, and therefore more legitimate than folk magic.
However, in the 14th and 15th centuries, the ecclesiastical position on witchcraft began to change, for reasons that historians have still not managed to completely pin down. Intellectuals began to embrace the argument that magic was only possible through the assistance of the Devil, so that all forms of witchcraft were a form of Satanism. This led to an idea that witches were not simply cunning folk with specialized knowledge but were actually in active collusion with Satan. Whereas a cunning man or woman might commit maleficia for specific human reasons like envy or revenge, a Satanist witch was simply malevolent as a person (rather the way Hollywood presents serial killers as just figures of motiveless violence). This meant that any magic cunning folk employed could be evidence of Satanism, even if it wasn’t maleficia. And increasingly there was an assumption that witches did not operate alone; they taught other witches and operated in covens that periodically assembled to worship the Devil, fornicate, and plan evil.
But this evolution took about 300 years to happen, so that its major manifestations took place in the 16th and 17th centuries, not in the Middle Ages. It is not the Middle Ages that was obsessed with witches and witch hunting, it is the Early Modern period. The 15th century was a transitional period, in which the number of witchcraft accusations began to climb, but there is no evidence of a ‘witch hunt’ during that period.
Mortianna
In RH:PoT, the witch is Mortianna (Geraldine McEwan), who is presented as a classic Early Modern stereotypical witch; she is an ugly old hag with a milky eye who lets toads and snakes roam freely in her rooms within Nottingham Castle. She’s Nottingham’s mother, so presumably she’s minor nobility. She mostly seems to predict the future, rather than performing curses or whatever. She also covers the altar of the castle’s chapel with magical paraphernalia, including a pentacle, knives, and, bizarrely, cobwebs. Early on in the film, the Sheriff of Nottingham (Alan Rickman) confronts Robin’s father as part of a group of white-robed, torch-carrying people. This looks a lot like 20th century cinematic depictions of Satanist covens, but this group is never mentioned again and the film basically drops this plotline after that scene. So I think the audience is supposed to assume that Mortianna and Nottingham are part of a coven of witches who worship Satan, even though the film never directly explains this.

Nottingham and his coven
But as I’ve already explained, this is entirely out of place in late 12th century England. The concept of Satanist witches and covens won’t even begin to emerge until the early 14th century, and they are entirely fantasies anyway, with no evidence that anyone actually did such things. Given that Robin Hood is an entirely fictional character made up well after the 1190s, I suppose it’s no more egregious to depict the Sheriff of Nottingham as working with a Satanist witch, but it’s a pretty glaring anachronism.
However, the film does unintentionally suggest that Martianna has some pretty impressive magical powers. In the finale, Nottingham drags Marion (Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio) into the chapel, where the evil bishop of Hereford is waiting to marry them so Nottingham can legally rape her. Mortianna is with him, and he bars the door of the chapel. Robin (Kevin Costner) and Azeem (Morgan Freeman) get to the chapel but are unable to get in, and try unsuccessfully to batter the door down with a statue. So the film seems to establish that there is only one door between the chapel and the hallway outside.
Eventually Robin goes out a nearby window and manages to swing through one of the chapel’s windows. About the same time, Mortianna magically appears in the hallway where Azeem is still trying to get the door open; she comes charging down the hallway at him and stabs him in the leg with a spear. Then she notices he’s black and briefly thinks he’s the Devil. She runs away, Azeem successfully impales her with the spear, and she falls out the window. Later, after Robin has just killed Nottingham, Mortianna suddenly appears behind the altar, having magically teleported there instead of falling to her death. She tries to stab Robin with the spear, but Azeem miraculously kicks the door in (the one he’s been unable to open so far), and kills her by throwing his scimitar at her (apparently his scimitar is aerodynamically balanced for throwing, despite the absurdly wide head). So apparently Satan has given Mortianna the ability to teleport at will. Either that or the film’s ending is just nonsense. You’ll have to decide which is more likely.
Want to Know More?
Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves [Double Sided]is available on Amazon.
One of the best studies of the shift from the folk magic model to the Satanic model of witchcraft is Richard Kieckhefer’s European Witch Trials: Their Foundations in Popular and Learned Culture, 1300-1500. He documents the shift in the accusations at trials. It’s a bit old, but it’s worth a read if you’re interested in medieval witchcraft.
Pingback: Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves: Cheerfully Disregarding the Past | An Historian Goes to the Movies
All that information about witches was really interesting – but you’ve just made me realise that the with Mortianna is played by the same actress who plays Miss Marple, in the television adaptions of the Agatha Christie books!!! As Mortianna she’s pretty horrifying, but as Miss Marple she is lovely and sweet and incredible smart – what a contrast?! Or could it be… witchcraft!
Thanks, I’ll re-read the article when this revelation has had a chance to sink in a bit.
LikeLike
It’s amusing to see the different characters one actor gets to play over a career.
LikeLike
In another deleted scene that was restored in the film’s Director’s Cut edition the Sheriff learns that Mortianna is his mother. This comes as a shock to the Sheriff who thought his parents were nobility. Mortianna reveals she killed the real child and substitued her own. This same scene also establishes that Mortianna has no real magic, just parlor tricks and spy tunnels around the castle. The Sheriff learns this when he finds one of her spy holes and confronts her over it.
I read that the making of PRINCE OF THIEVES was chaotic in it’s post production. Director Kevin Reynolds original cut was disliked by Costner who felt the movie focused too much on the character of the Sheriff. So he locked Reynolds (who was supposed to his friend) out of the editing bay and supervised his own cut which became the film’s theatrical release cut. Costner basically exercised the scenes like the one above that helped explain a number of plot holes in the film just to give himself more screen time.
Here’s the scene, it takes place after the Sheriff’s attack on Robin’s camp:
LikeLiked by 1 person
The sheriff is pretty much the best thing in the film. Costner’s Robin is bland and forgettable. Rickman got a ton of attention in the US from this role–it pretty much put him on the map. And he turned the part down twice; reportedly Reynolds gave him carte blanche on his performance.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You bet he did. Like many other things in the movie, Mortianna seems to be inspired by the ROBIN OF SHERWOOD tv series. There Robin faced all manner or Devil worshippers, witches, alchemists, and the occult. Robin himself was involved in the supernatural as the series had him as the “Son of Herne”. Basically he was supposed to be working for the Pagan forest God Herne, he’s even given a magic sword called Albion in the series.
LikeLike
Yeah. I never got into the series for just that reason. The whole ‘pagan survival’ thing tends to bug me, although there have been exceptions.
LikeLike
Well in the case of ROBIN OF SHERWOOD the show made it work. If you want an example of it not working you just have to look at the Robin Hood from the 90’s that tried to ride the coat tails of the Kevin Sorbo HERCULES show. That Robin Hood series had a Xena style Marion, dragons, and even more or less a ninja in one episode.
LikeLike
Just to point it out… when she says “The painted man…” she doesn’t mistake Azeem as Satan. Painted may refer to his marks or the color of his skin, but earlier she had fallen into the Sheriff’s arms and said “The painted man, he haunts my dreams, the man with the marked face from foreign lands” or something similar. Basically saying she saw her own death, or the hand that would kill her anyway. Nothing to do with Satan there.
LikeLike
Thank you for writing this post. I just re-watched this last night after I don’t know when the last time was. I did notice all the witchcraft stuff was typical Hollywood/haunted house decoration. I chuckled when Azeem had supposedly killed her and then she appeared in the locked room again, almost killing Robin. Along with some other stuff you pointed out, it made me wonder if they ran out of time and had to edit it down. Wonder if the original screenplay/story explained more…
LikeLike
As I said in my first post on Mortiana there was a significant amount of scenes involving her and the Sheriff that were cut due to Kevin Costner wanting more screen time. One deleted scene I posted a link to that is now apparently defunct showed that not only was Mortiana a charlatan whose “magic” was nothing more than spy holes and secret tunnels around the castle. But she was also the real mother of the Sheriff, having murdered the true child of the Nottinghams and substituting her own. Interestingly there is no mention in either the deleted scenes or the novelization as to who is the Sheriff’s real father.
LikeLike
So Mortianna is a master of illusion, replaced an aristocratic baby with her own, lives in the castle, but can’t afford any nice clothes? Or even to do her hair? Pretty sure she could have stolen something nice to wear once in a while. Why do they show her looking all raggedy?
LikeLike
Never watched the movie, for various reasons. But a friend of mine and I were talking about the witch-craze and the irony that it took place during the Renaissance, as did many persecutions of new scientific ideas by the Church.
LikeLike
There are strong reasons why it happened during that era. As I discuss in my series of reviews on Salem, it’s probably a response to doubts about the existence of God.
LikeLike
Interesting comments but I think your assessment of the history of the association of witchcraft with Satan is a bit erroneous because the Jews since the time of Moses associated witchcraft (as well as child-sacrifice, necromancy, sorcery and spiritism) with evil, worthy of capital punishment (See Deuteronomy 18:9-14).
LikeLike
There isn’t much in Jewish culture that connects witchcraft to Satan. In Jewish thought, Satan is not particularly an instigator of evil, nothing in the Tanakh connects him to witchcraft, so far as I know. And medieval Christian thought paid very little attention to Jewish theology anyway. It’s well documented by historians that the medieval connection between witchcraft and Satanism only begins to emerge in the early 14th century and isn’t solidly in place until the early 15th century.
LikeLike
Fair enough… I find it surprising that professing Christians wouldn’t associate witchcraft with Satan but I suppose those were times of great illiteracy and very little familiarity with the Bible.
LikeLike
Even the trained theologians didn’t associate Satan with witchcraft. There’s no special reason to until the connection was made. We don’t associate Satan with psychotic killers, for example, simply because our culture hasn’t connected the two. Nothing in the Bible associates Satan with people practicing magic, so until the connection got made (for reasons historians still don’t fully understand) there wasn’t anything actively leading them to do so.
LikeLike
Have you read “Francis Young’s Magic as a Political Crime in Medieval and Early Modern England: A History of Sorcery and Treason”? It’s a look at the history of charges of magical plots to either kill or influence the monarch, and at how magic was seen as a particular threat, because the king was generally protected against non-magical attempts at his life, but that there was no reliable defense against magic.
LikeLike